Pure storage vs dell emc reddit

Last UpdatedMarch 5, 2024

by

Agreed. You get what you pay for. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your Jul 19, 2021 · In this article, we look at the big six storage array makers – Dell EMC, HPE, IBM, Hitachi Vantara, NetApp and Pure Storage – and what they offer in terms of consumption models. One of the hats I wear is SAN/NAS admin. It can easily manage massive workloads and deliver very high-end performance. They bought Compellent but it was still only midrange. ago. Management vendor locked us with EMC previously so been trying to get away from them. Scales up to 16 PB. They don't do cifs great, but thats not what they are designed for. ROI: Users of both products report being very satisfied with the ROI. Edit to add: I also added the load from a VNX 5800 and 7600 to it. HyperConverged: Simplivity vs. Fast, efficient, and NVMe-enabled. Similarly, Pure’s 10:1 average total eficiency should be directly compared to Dell’s 4:1 storage eficiency guarantee claim. Evergreen support is expensive, but you get the controller upgrades and their support is top-notch. 4. Unisphere is the graphical management interface that enables Dell EMC Unity customers to manage storage systems and perform every-day management tasks related to storage systems by utilizing a web interface based on HTML5. q8shihab. TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP. 5 Dell Technologies, “Dell PowerMax, 8500,” accessed August 16, 2022 Oct 26, 2020 · Think about that: Dell is taking its existing products and attempting to force them into an as-a-service model—in which each product has its own independent management APIs—and somehow deliver a unified and seamless experience. Check out the r/sysadmin "Am I getting F*ed Friday" posts (each Friday) where you can post configs and see more realistic The Pure Storage Pure1 cloud-based platform provides centralized management. 6 6 Based on Dell internal analysis using publicly available specs in August 2023 comparing maximum effective capacity for PowerStore 1200 and FlashArray //X20. Apr 18, 2019 · Data Center Dell. Here are 10 reasons why customers are moving on from Dell, and moving up to Pure Storage: 1. Pure Storage FlashArray X10R2-ETH19. Uncertainty. The next closet product is UnityXT which does not have the Live Volume aspect and it's been suggest to use vPlex to I'm well under 50, and after running datacenter operations for a major eRetailer, I spent over a decade as a storage specialist at EMC (later Dell). We've even done in place upgrades in drive size. Pure Storage FlashArray users feel that it is an expensive solution. You end up with about 33% more effective capacity in a 100% NVMe, easy to use, and Evergreen 3U footprint. Managing and provisioning VMware disks became simpler from a single interface in the Vcenter In a SMB environment where you won't grow pass 4 hosts, this setup is very common. Infosight and future expansion costs. The Pure is doing bog standard iSCSI/FC or NFS/S3 (depending on product), they work the same as any other block/file array. Both Simplivity and EMC have been on site and showed us their product but I am wondering what other admins think about the solutions. Upgrade to FlashArray//XL to consolidate more business services—bigger databases, more users, and more app workloads—on fewer arrays. Pure we're almost double in our TCO calcs when adding additional capacity. Currently we have a single Equallogic PS6100 ( 8x 1gb iSCSI ) with 15k 300G drives for SQL backend storage for clients ( individual DBs per client, RAID 10 ). 6 stars with 189 reviews. This can work in any vertical, healthcare, manufacturing, financial, insurance, etc. Pure FlashArray//X™ is a cut above Dell EMC. Being new to Pure I was just wondering if anyone that's been using it for awhile care to share what type of problems you've had if any. A 25-minute install time, manageable from the cloud. The compellent is perfect for our needs and recently been using live volume more and more. The old VNXe series is what you're describing, but not the Unity platform. The vendor states PowerFlex enables extreme flexibility, massive scalability, and enterprise-class performance and resiliency while simplifying May 8, 2017 · That 91TB delivers about 270TB of effective capacity at our global average 5:1 data reduction (11:1 in efficiency terms including thin provisioning). ECS boasts unrivaled economics, manageability, resilience, and scalability to satisfy the demands of today's next-gen, robust business enterprise ecosystems. This Nimble only has 4TB of deduplication capacity. Pure storage is amazing, but suuuuper expensive. Physically, designs seem fairly similar Purestorage and HPE Nimble (Alletra 6000) NVME arrays. I would go with Nimble. Pure is by far the easiest to administer and they just work. XtremIO x2 came to market which addressed most of the Apr 24, 2019 · Furthermore, Evergreen Gold delivers demonstrated TCO savings compared to legacy storage because it avoids 100% of the cost of the “forklift” upgrades — the CAPEX rebuy of controllers and media required by legacy storage. If you want all flash, Pure is the go to. Sep 11, 2023 · The six PowerStore B. NetApp vs Pure Storage. FlashArray and Purity have a proven track record for 99. Dell EMC Powerstore. But FC will always outperform iSCSI. A total capacity of 55TB with an estimated 70K IOPS. 6/5 stars with 5 reviews. Nov 9, 2017 · Dell EMC’s is the latest effort, and in this blog we’ll go through their “Future-Proof Storage Loyalty Program” announcement and compare/contrast it to Evergreen Storage. DAS (Direct attached SAS) isn't meant to grow pass a certain amount of hosts, but if you have to give other hosts access, you could just setup a Truenas virtual machine on the EMC SAN and present it as Strongly leaning towards iSCSI vs FC. The specific terms of the settlement are confidential, but include a payment to Dell, the dismissal of all litigation between the parties, mutual releases and a license to the disputed patent. Pure does it for you, which is really nice, but also you gotta make sure they don't eff up. re-buying legacy storage, and up to 65% and more when Pure Storage has unmatched commercial programs including EVER MODERN controller upgrades, NVME NOW storage module trade-in, and other system refresh programs. NetApp: Legacy architecture slows innovation. Absolutely Pure Storage. Dell’s focus appears to be more around reducing the engineering costs of its multiple product lines. 4:1 Storage Efficiency Guarantee. Smaller co with good product FTW. 6GHz processor and 24GB DRAM. Its not based on Unity at all. ® I love our Pure arrays. Proven Innovation vs. It has boiled down to Dell vs HPE (Currently using HPE Servers and Dell Compellent SC4020 (with 12x 1. All FlashArray models support a single resource pool of flash storage media equally accessed by block or file workloads. Score 9. Actual results vary. Raw vs usable ratio is 4:1 and although Infosight is nice, performance seems unmatched, especially if you are using fiber connections. Unisphere focuses and stands on simplifying management by having an interface that has been designed to allow storage If so, EMC/Compellent is going to be your choice. Be sure to get a full list of costs, as Dell and Netapp will charge extra to enable additional features that you get all in one package with something like Nimble. Hyperconverged is a great option. As it is a Hyperconverged Infrastructure and it is also the integration of Dell EMC hardware and Vmware, the flexibility that VxRail provides is effective. $55K CDN (25 disks). By contrast, Pure Storage Flash Arrays rates 4. HPE, NetApp and IBM, like the losers Oct 17, 2018 · With all EMC Unity All-Flash models, Dell offers: Unified storage with All-Flash performance. With an all-new 5U chassis, designed for the latest powerful CPUs, expect an up to 70% performance boost over FlashArray//X90. Dell only sold the EMC midrange stuff. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data. Dell EMC Elastic Cloud Storage (ECS) is a file and object storage solution from Dell EMC. Download PDF (342 KB) 3Based on Dell internal analysis of max bandwidth (64K blocks) of the PowerMax 8000 (350GB/s) versus max bandwidth of competitive mainstream arrays, July 2019. Storage vMotion is your friend. Unlike Dell EMC offerings, there’s nothing “l Sep 11, 2019 · Here is the status of the S/4HANA system. Assuming they use vSphere and are licensed for it. Given the same storage, SAS should outperform FC and iSCSI. EMC XtremIO hit the market in 2013 about a decade ago and had a really rough start. 6 Based on Dell analysis comparing NVMe/TCP discovery and registration with PowerMax/PowerStore using SmartFabric Storage Software vs competitive storage solutions, March 2022. Reply. It was/is about velocity in SMB space for Dell. * Sales (800) 976-6494. Much less energy efficient. Each array controller has a 6-core Intel 1. OneFS is a weird clustered storage file system with no single point of failure, where things like resiliency level can be re-striped on the fly. Power your innovation with a universal storage layer. 2/0 - $76400 FA-X10R2-19. NetApp has a rating of 4. Purity Migrate app has been inserted on to your SAN network with Pure Storage FlashArray//X as the target array. Dell EMC SC vs HPE Nimble. To date, Dell has been unsuccessful at unifying the products it currently offers, each having its own management Pure is a breath of fresh air and their stuff actually works- really well. Great policy, you should stick with it. Archived post. Currently have VMAX, Isilon, data domain, XIO and VNX just decommissioned, VXRail, recoverpoint damn near every EMC storage device you can think of and it’s been hell. Pure Storage engineered FlashArrayTM systems to be Evergreen®, which means that your migration to Pure Storage will be the last one you’ll need to do. Portfolio lacks features like data-in-place upgrades and native clustering for business agility. NetApp is expensive and a jack of all trades but someone always has something bad to say about it. We are getting ready to invest in new VMware Infrastructure. 0 product. Data reduction services for greater efficiency. Dell (EMC) is pushing HCI hard though. We think after reviewing the Pure are just more aggressive on the market right now. NetApp. 7. 7 stars with 238 reviews. I honestly don't think SAN/NAS is going anywhere. Unique Categories: Small ( < 30Tb ) redundant SAN options. 4 stars with 297 reviews. It's not just the speed of the topology, but mostly the efficiency of the protocol. Pure Storage’s market share was 12. Pure Storage by all accounts makes the best storage arrays in the industry and continues to grow faster than the old school storage vendors like bitchass NetApp, Dell, HPE and IBM. It took EMC and VMWare support over 2 weeks to figure this out. NetApp doesn't tier (WAFL can't, meaningfully). Hoping it works. based on preference data from user reviews. Once that matures it will be amazing. Nobody went to Dell to buy serious enterprise storage, all those deals got punted up directly to EMC. The FlashArray platform supports non-disruptive May 9, 2017 · With the Dell EMC XtremIO and VMAX platforms, customers are asked to settle for two of these three. Find out why 100% of Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice reviewers would recommend Pure Storage—and why we’re A Leader in the Gartner® Magic Quadrant ™ for Primary Storage. Dell EMC leverages cutting-edge improvements on industry-standard technology so customers can keep up with future IT advancements. Hi folks, we are currently looking into getting a new additional storage, currently using HP 3PAR and we are looking into Nimble and PureStorage. Never-Worry Data Migrations. Based on verified reviews from real users in the Primary Storage Platforms market. IF you want them to even get better, use two lights (fill light by the camera; and a "key light" at 45 degrees. For the eighth consecutive year, Dell Technologies named a Leader in the 2023 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Distributed File Systems and Object Storage. If you love storage, you're better off going to a storage vendor agnostic event; VMWorld maybe. We're a small K12, but looking at augmenting our HP LeftHand storage. We are typically an EMC house (2x VNX 7500's in Primary & DR DC, VNXe3100 in DMZ) but have been approached by Nimble & Dell and I'm looking for opinions on their arrays (reliability, performance) and support. With bold claims like “never rebuy a TB you’ve purchased, never do a data migration again and never do another forklift upgrade”, but the devil, and more importantly, the customer costs are in the details. Just this past May 2018, Dell EMC Disclosure to provide context on potential biases and experience: I am a former EMC field engineer who left after the Dell merger was announced and now works in the healthcare IT sector. Based on verified reviews from real users in the Distributed File Systems and Object Storage (Transitioning to File and Object Storage Platforms) market. HCI is too new for me to mess with. Make sure you look at expansion costs for all of your shorlisters. Jul 14, 2021 · This positioned EMC Symmetrix for the enterprise and CLARiiON as a mid-range offering. I ran somewhere around 16 pure arrays and they were always set it and forget it (obviously pay attention to capacity). Dell EMC has the habit of screwing people over. On the other side is a Tegile T3630 featuring an all-flash head with 24 x 500GB HGST SSDs and 2 x ESH-25 shelves with 3 x 250GB SSDs and 13 x 2TB HDDs. 8 stars with 597 reviews. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Dell EMC and NetApp are two of the largest names in the data storage market, with a MarketWatch report showing Dell and NetApp topping the list of “key players in the global enterprise storage market. 92 SSD) We have been quoted a HF40 (42TB RAW, 17% SSD) and a Dell SC5020 (50TB SSD RAW) (There is less than a 5% price difference) HPE are very confident in the performance Proven Modern Simplicity. If pricing is too high, get a competing quote and they'll quickly drop their prices. Pure Storage relies on proprietary technology, which can make it difficult to take advantage of market advancements. Pure Storage has provided outstanding pre- and post-sales technical support. We compare multiple aspects of FlashArray//XL vs. The Dell EMC storage management stack consists of isolated management tools like Storage DELL EMC UNITY addresses this concern well and provides robust storage. 7%, down from 8. 7 stars with 775 reviews. S. I have used many different storage systems over more than two decades. Has anyone ever had the storage unvailable for a significant amount of time barring May 22, 2022 · Pure Storage FlashArray users say it is secure, user-friendly, and fast but they would like the solution’s reporting to improve. PureStorage. Software defined storage may be something to consider on your next hardware refresh but I have yet to see a compelling case to abandon working tech for it. Just add a data pack/shelf and walk away. N/A. I might also need to increase the requirements (capacity and/or expansion) without taking it down. 6 Based on Dell internal analysis using publicly available specs in August 2023 comparing maximum effective capacity for PowerStore 1200 and FlashArray //X20. It replaced a VNX 5400 with around 160 * 600GB SAS and around 30 * 4GB SATA. Read Why Customers Prefer Pure Storage. Or at least see problems before they happen, rather than as they're happening. Pricing in Canadian dollars. 4% compared to the previous year. Dell EMC further caveats this program by saying that the “trade-In value We compare multiple aspects of FlashArray//XL vs. If you're looking for all flash pretty soon, NetApp is probably your best bet since they're REALLY dropping their flash prices to make that their niche. I recommend Pure Storage Flash Arrays mainly for the ease of admin management, cost, and data deduplication. We are looking at an Infrastructure refresh. Aug 31, 2020 · Pure Storage has led the field with vision, execution – and the industry’s best purpose-built, all-flash array. Pure’s product family is designed for simplicity and built on modularity to provide the greatest degree of operational agility possible. Our network game is pretty strong, experience w/ FC is low. Hardware Investment Product Innovation. Their support is great and evergreen is awesome. Reply reply. 7 hosts connected to a 140TB HPE Nimble CS-1000 on 10gbps iScsi. Total consumed capacity was ~800TB in one rack. Just keep in mind that you can't do your own firmware upgrades or storage increases. I have a (large) MSP client retiring 5PB of exchange servers on EMC arrays and we are flipping everything to Pure, as support contracts expire. It is possible to scale out easily and will get support from the vendor instantly. Unity’s feature set revolves around it being a unified storage array with both san / nas features natively, where as nimble is only san, and you have to do your nas functions through another software. One part of the program includes the ability to “trade-in existing or competitive systems for credit towards next gen Dell EMC storage, data protection or HCI product offerings. The mindshare of Pure Storage FlashArray is 6. 4 PB all-flash storage. For hybrid flash or tiered storage, I would go NetApp. Plagued with issues, disruptive XIOS upgrades, BBU failures and the list goes on, frequently dunked on by Pure Storage. (which is currently happening to us) Infinidat doesnt care about a 50TB small fish. It leaves me wondering whether they’re focused on solving customer problems or self-created Dell problems. Yes, Dell is cheaper, but working with them is a hell. #4 Dynamic AppsON – “Better Together” with VxRail. It is also spec'd with the max FAST CACHE of 800GB. No More Data Migrations, No Planned Downtime. PowerStore delivers 5x better data density than Pure FlashArray//X20. The following steps are performed to migrate S/4HANA system to Pure Storage FlashArray//X: On S4HANA initiate the ABAP load runner to generate live data on the DellEMC VMAX250F. Feb 24, 2022 · Learn More . Pricing: Dell EMC PowerStore received mixed reviews in the pricing category. There is no way to change the certificate on the admin gui. Nimble vs Pure , Nimble wins for us on 2 things . 6. Dell PowerFlex (formerly VxFlex) software-defined storage solutions aim to enable transformational agility for organizations looking to modernize their datacenter operations. Dell EMC VMax rates 4. Its entry-level all-flash model, the Dell EMC Unity 350F offers: 4 TB to 2. Many thanks, Verta More Powerful for Greater Efficiency. The mindshare of Dell XtremIO is 1. Synology has a rating of 4. Easily maintained 4-5GB/s throughput with sub 10ms latency; most writes were acknowledged in under 1ms, and reads in under 4ms. It has the same limitations and single points of failure as every other traditional raid. And, with our Evergreen on-ramp via our new NVMe NOW! program for Dell EMC customers, you can get onto a modern storage ownership experience and make it your last forklift upgrade. 2TB-19. PowerMax is suited for a mid-tier to enterprise company. I'm currently looking at quotes from Pure, Nimble, Tegile, Tintri, and Dell (EMC). Oct 16, 2018 · In 2018, many storage vendors have also realized that NVMe is a “must have” technology in the All-Flash-Array (AFA) storage market going forward, as Dell EMC, NetApp, HPE-Nimble, and IBM have all either announced and started delivering products that use NVMe, or have stated their intentions to do so. Be aware that you pay for the fact that every few years, Pure replaces the blades and puts in new ones and SSDs, so even though support costs are higher, you always are upgraded. AFAICT, Dell-EMC doesn't innovate in storage. Actual performance will vary. HPE. No more Compellent : (. #2 “Scale-up and Scale-out” and “Automated Management of Resources Across the Cluster”. Got my pure pricing, forgot to edit this when it came in, so here it is now. I'm not specifically looking for opinions on the arrays listed in the title, but if so that is all the better. I think NetApp is the best, especially as it is so flexible. Pure Storage has a rating of 4. 6 stars with 369 reviews. I am looking for an "future-proof" storage with scalability capabilities, and I have those i in mind. If you want to compare other vendors perhaps look at NetApp or Pure. The EMC 450F seems more like a mid-range NAS that's trying to be a SAN (but is also a NAS). Dell Technologies. Pure: Addresses the most demanding application performance needs with 100% all-flash, end-to-end NVMe and NVMe-oF. In any case, pick 2 solutions and do a POC to compare the 2. [ ↑ ] Dell EMC Hybrid and All-Flash storage platforms combine scalability, efficiency, intelligence and multi-cloud integration that Pure Storage simply Sep 17, 2018 · Meanwhile, while NetApp is the number-two player overall in external storage behind Dell EMC, it’s the leader in all-flash storage, the fast-growing part of the storage market. Four years ago, it was great. I used Linux LVM tools for physical boxes successfully in the past for online data migrations. We plan on procuring 10GbE switches to serve the SAN + nodes. • 4 mo. EMC XtremIO - A decade later. Storage expansion is a snap. We just did a full tear-out of all of our EMC gear in favor of Pure. Comparison based on Dell analysis using publicly available information, July 2022. Up to 85% less energy use/carbon emissions than competing all-flash, lower e-waste with proven Evergreen design*****. As Dell EMC VxRail comes as pre-built, the deployment process is simple and easy. 3/5 stars with 10 reviews. Nov 11, 2020 · With PowerScale (the so-called Unstrucutured. There is no way to change the VASA certificate the array presents. iSCSI is certainly great, and has come a long way. Other vendors are catching up in terms of QoL features but Pure is still my go to for anything. With Pure, they can get all three with the new (Orange) //X. #3 “Active/Active Controller Architecture” is a good thing. Such a hard decision. Pure Storage also has valuable public cloud offerings which my company uses to our benefit, including PortWorks. The average 3:1 data reduction rate achieved by the PowerMax should be compared to the FlashArray//X’s average data reduction rate of 5:1, which provides a 67% improvement over the PowerMax. Symmetrix became DMX, which evolved into VMAX, and is now PowerMax 6. This was with Cisco UCS, MDS switches, and FC protocol. This old girl consumed around 30U rack space whereas the Powerstore consumes 2U. 2. I have used and like EMC SANs but dealing with Dell is like voluntarily grabbing a hot frying pan with your bare hands knowing you'll get burned. These savings are conservatively 30% over a six-year period vs. Compellent was a 2-node modular array and couldn't seriously compete with a VMAX. The Unity 380 we were quoted is 384TB with the first shelf (about 74TB) being 6. Download PDF (342 KB) . If native nas is not important I would ask for a proposal on Dell EMC’s SC5020. Workload is pretty average, Vmware and Veeam, some SQL Servers max IOPS slightly under 20k, average at Dell Technologies. It can easily take on and manage what it may take with various storage arrays. Ease of Use. Pure's pricing have been surprisingly good for this solution. This is a pretty radical expansion and Pure Storage FlashArray. Dell/EMC isn't innovating or doing anything exciting internally - they're slamming flash into antiquated architectures, giving it a pretty name, and adding their markup. 7% in C1Q20 and was up from 10. 9999% availability and an all-inclusive array feature set. malikto44. The feature list is impressive and competitive with the other platforms, but based on past experience with Dell Nov 5, 2020 · Here’s why Dell’s PowerStore all-flash storage array is a market differentiation compared to HPE, Pure Storage, Hitachi, Huawei and NetApp, according to Scott Millard. The Key Light is also 1-2 stops brighter than the fill light. Pure Storage (“Pure”) makes a lot of noise about their Evergreen Storage program. I fully appreciate you are not a product photography house. Upgrade Nimble CS-1000 to EMC Unity 380 XT. I've been given competitive quotes between the two Dell products, but I'm wondering if others out there could help share some thoughts on the two items. Finally got a Pure Storage array installed for a proof of concept. CLARiiON became Unity, then Unity XT 7 and is now PowerStore 8, for the “mid-range 9 . Keystone: Performance SLO only (no known remediation) GreenLake for Block Storage: Performance SLO only (no known remediation) Energy-Efficient, Sustainable Storage. You do pay for it but WTH, it's worth it. 2TB 1 Month Evergreen Silver Subscription, 4 Hour Delivery, 24/7 Support - $750 FA-X10R2-19. I just don't know what storage solution to go with. People love Pure, but I have never used it. All-Flash Storage. All data-service platforms can be seen from one place, whether on-premises FlashArray, Pure Cloud Block Store in AWS or Azure, or Portworx container storage. interesting, Dell's very own r740xd photos at their website are adequate, but not impressive. PowerStore intelligently automates with 5x better data density. We have 2 Pure Arrays and will be using the synchronus mirror feature between both (forgot what they call it at the moment). I have experience with Netapp, HP EVA, 3par, Dell PowerScale and EMC Symmetrix. We were also looking at the Pure X20 solution which was my preferred solution but Dell blew Pure out of the water with the deal which was cheaper to buy and also included 7 years warranty. We are currently going through the same thing , Nimble , Pure , Netapp and Unity . side-by-side comparison of Dell EMC VMax vs. I think it is probably great if the only type of storage required is block based. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the Its a ground up developed NVMe powered storage array that Dell EMC created to eventually replace the capabilities of Unity XT and SC Series. ECS has been created to support both traditional and next-generation ecosystems equally. Looking for some advice between two storage solutions. The VASA certificate has the IP address of the array as the common name, and VVol connections using the DNS name will fail. Investing in UNITY system is less expensive than all-flash storage systems. The idea is to have a "zero downtime" storage, so in case of a failover, it should be transparent for the user. VNXe was entry level, equivalent to ME5 now. At the end of December 2017, Dell EMC launched its Future Proof Loyalty Program. What I'm concerned with is how reliable they are, given how young the platform is. 0 out of 10. Dell Technologies has a rating of 4. So look for it to expand in function over the next few months / years. The Dell EMC program has the following components: 3 Year Satisfaction Guarantee. Pure Storage Flash Arrays. FlashArray Built for Modern All-flash and Next Gen Datacenters. 2TB 1 Month Evergreen Gold Subscription, 4 Hour Delivery, Synology is traditional software raid underneath, on ext4, slowly moving into BTRFS. GARTNER REPORT Pure Storage has been named A Magic Quadrant™ Leader for the 9th year in a row. It actually just perpetuates the complexities and trade-offs associated with a 17-year-old legacy-architected and HDD-based file system. The names have changed several times, but EMC still has the two options. Dell EMC. 1% in the prior year - LIKE A PROPER HIGH GROWTH COMPANY. 300TB VMAX – Full Credit for //X Consolidation. Swap drive, wait a few minutes, swap drive, wait a few minutes, and so on. A couple of their competitors have brought up that Pure's C series uses QLC drives and they generally have a shorter life span than the TLC They are fairly new; about 19 months of "prod" sells. Compare to Dell PowerMax. It has a lot of the same capabilities, but its currently a 1. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience Pure had a nice (marketing) web page a couple of years ago, showing the back of a previous generation EMC storage, and their next-gen, fresh from the ground-up Dell-EMC storage, and the parts looked identical. Efficient, secure, multicloud solutions for your data from the #1 provider of enterprise storage. As Equallogic is EOL and we have 1 year of support remaining, I'm looking for options to migrate to in the iSCSI world. Nimble vs. Award. Oct 19, 2016 · Pure Storage and EMC today have agreed to settle all litigation between the two companies. Ah yes, all those mid-range NAS boxes with their active-active controller architecture. OK, good, back to normal flash array business competition. “Reasonable” to “moderate high” price for SAN. Our VAR quoted an all NVMe Dell PowerStore 1000T for approx. So as we all no Compellent is no more and we are due to replace our SC5020 as it's coming up to it's 5 year cycle. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best So we're currently considering Pure Storage's FlashArray C50 storage array as an upgrade from our current mix of SSD and HDD storage appliances. items that I’ll cover are: #1 “Built from the ground up” and “Native File Services”. Pure makes solid stuff and Dell/EMC are probably just trying to push a sale. good point, very valid. I'm sure the software was revised, but it didn't look like all new hardware. Assumes average 4:1 data reduction for PowerStore, 5:1 for Pure Storage. 1%, down from 1. In the second EMC Isilon VS NetApp OnTAP cluster. Hello, seeking advice or experience on moving from HPE Nimble to Dell EMC Unity. We're ~10-16TB and use iSCSI 10Gb SFP. It was constantly speculated that EMC would drop the line. 1% compared to the previous year. Why Future-Proof Wins. Dell EMC PowerMax, from the essential elements of each system through a deeper comparison of features and capabilities. NEXT platform), we believe that Dell brings very little that’s new to address your modern unstructured data needs. Nimble got scalped by HPE and most do not trust them. Thanks PowerStore delivers 5x better data density than Pure FlashArray//X20. EMC VxRail. Sep 12, 2018 · Share. If going Dell, Unity or PowerStore is the way. AFF and FAS systems now support FC, iscsi, NFS, SMB and s3. We currently have 3 ESXi 6. All offer some The Dell PowerMax 8500 array has a 4:1 data reduction rate compared to the 5:1 ratio of the Pure FlashArray// XL170; however, the Dell PowerMax array can support a higher capacity in part because of the number of arrays you can aggregate into a single storage domain. ”. Dell has long been a runaway leader in this market, owning over a quarter of it alone, but NetApp is an innovative competitor If you already own the Pure AFA then I would stick with your current setup. bu xo my gc nf gp mw ql wo ep